It's simply not going to happen under my watch...nuff said.
For those wanting more info on the matter, keep reading.
To be clear, I fully support the idea of sharing new ideas and concepts to others, be it in a financial way or just in general. (I am NOT a financial adviser by the way.) When it comes to shady territory like how BitConnect is portrayed in the media on the other hand (peep Texas & North Carolina), I am not willing to bring others into such an unexplored platform that I simply don't know much about. Reflecting back to my first blog post, I describe myself as being a "guinea pig" for testing BitConnect. In a science lab, the test subject should be isolated and not spread beyond a controlled point. Since I am striving to be as transparent as possible when using this platform, I don't want to accelerate my "earnings" by adding more people under me. Essentially, I am testing if the statement given by many BitConnect supporters saying, "You can earn on BitConnect without having referrals," is true.
Along with being transparent, I want to be unbiased in the process. Sure, making a passive income is awesome, but a passive income from a questionable business isn't awesome. When looking back at my first blog post again, the $130 USD that I originally "invested" into BitConnect is money that I can afford to lose, and any profits earned from that initial "investment" I can freely accept as lost via an Exit Scam, if BitConnect ends up being that way. This is the same mindset investors should have when investing into anything. (Again, NOT a financial adviser here.)
To be clear, I fully support the idea of sharing new ideas and concepts to others, be it in a financial way or just in general. (I am NOT a financial adviser by the way.) When it comes to shady territory like how BitConnect is portrayed in the media on the other hand (peep Texas & North Carolina), I am not willing to bring others into such an unexplored platform that I simply don't know much about. Reflecting back to my first blog post, I describe myself as being a "guinea pig" for testing BitConnect. In a science lab, the test subject should be isolated and not spread beyond a controlled point. Since I am striving to be as transparent as possible when using this platform, I don't want to accelerate my "earnings" by adding more people under me. Essentially, I am testing if the statement given by many BitConnect supporters saying, "You can earn on BitConnect without having referrals," is true.
Along with being transparent, I want to be unbiased in the process. Sure, making a passive income is awesome, but a passive income from a questionable business isn't awesome. When looking back at my first blog post again, the $130 USD that I originally "invested" into BitConnect is money that I can afford to lose, and any profits earned from that initial "investment" I can freely accept as lost via an Exit Scam, if BitConnect ends up being that way. This is the same mindset investors should have when investing into anything. (Again, NOT a financial adviser here.)
Comments
Post a Comment